From: Maury Goodman (maury.goodman@anl.gov)
Date: Wed Apr 20 2005 - 09:28:44 CDT
Same Here
Maury
Dick Hahn wrote:
>
> The line went dead at 1030 EDT and I could not reconnect. Did you reserve
> only one hour for the call?
>
> Dick
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steven Biller [mailto:s.biller1@physics.ox.ac.uk]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 4:51 PM
> To: braidwood@hep.uchicago.edu
> Subject: Re: A 'Moving' Discussion
>
> Hi all,
>
> This is just a reminder that the 'moving' call is at 8:30 Central,
> tomorrow (Wednesday). Jon has already sent out phone-in details.
> In order to get things going, I've outlined below what I think
> the main goals of the call are and have also listed a number of
> questions which Jon and I think are particularly relevant and could
> perhaps serve to focus the discussion.
>
> Cheers,
>
> - Steve
>
> GENERAL GOALS:
> ===============
>
> I. To make sure we're all on the same page
>
> II. To make sure we can answer questions
> (must be more explicit about the details
> of exactly what's being proposed)
>
> SOME QUESTIONS:
> ================
>
> 1) What is the role of moving?
>
> "The central measurement will NOT be dependent on moving,
> (*agreed*)
> but it will serve as a {POSSIBLE or IMPORTANT} cross-check" (*to be
> resolved*)
>
> 2) Exactly what does the measurement give us?
> What are the limitations?
> Are there other ways of achieving this?
> Do you get anything more than a redundant measurement and
> don't you already have that with 2 near and 2 far?
>
> 3) What is the additional cost of moving and can this be justified?
>
> 4) What are the risks and can these be justified?
>
> 5) WHAT IS THE PLAN?
> (Move at the beginning? Move later only if necessary?)
> How long to run where?
> What do you do based on what you see?
>
> 6) Is there advantage/disadvantage to playing down the
> relevance of moving?
>
> 7) Any other questions of relevance???
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Apr 21 2005 - 03:10:08 CDT