From: Matthew Worcester (mworcest@hep.uchicago.edu)
Date: Thu Sep 08 2005 - 13:22:00 CDT
Hi Stan,
You know that Chicago is using RH7.3. Another idea that goes along with
automated build testing is a development release for the software. Each
time the test builds succeed the development tag would be updated. I have
ReactorFsim building every night here at UC (Linux only) but never found a
good way in CVS to keep a rolling development tag without causing later
problems for people checking code back in. You and I should probably talk
about how we could set this up for BW.
Matt
On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Stan Seibert wrote:
> In order to head off some of the build problems we've been having, I'm
> planning to setup some automated build testing so I can quickly see an update
> has broken RAT on a particular platform.
>
> Since it seem Texas is the only group using SPARC Solaris, I'm going to
> assume everyone else is using Linux on AMD/Intel CPUs. Which Linux
> distributions are people planning to use RAT on? So far I've seen RedHat 7.2
> and RedHat 7.3 mentioned on the list.
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> ---
> Stan Seibert
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Fri Sep 09 2005 - 00:01:02 CDT