From: Matthew Worcester (mworcest@hep.uchicago.edu)
Date: Sat Feb 11 2006 - 15:23:31 CST
Hi Bill,
I agree with Josh. At some point we should probably identify a standard
set of parameters, such as the mean/width of the Gd capture peak, that
people adding new code should check with the baseline design and IBD
events before committing any changes. If the standard numbers change then
we should know why before the code goes in. But now things are still in
flux. If Stan agrees, just check it in.
Matt
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Josh R Klein wrote:
> Bill,
> Matt and Stan should weigh in here, but my feeling is that you should
> just go ahead and install things---cvs should let us roll back if we need
> to.
>
> Thanks,
> Josh
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 07:14:36PM -0500, William Seligman wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've converted Joe Formaggio's neutrino-electron elastic-scattering code
>> into RAT. I've tested things (to the best as my limited understanding
>> of the physics of the experiment), and it looks vaguely OK. Should I
>> just put the code into CVS and update the Wiki with the new commands, or
>> should I wait for the next Braidwood Simulations meeting first?
>> --
>> Bill Seligman | Phone: (914) 591-2823
>> Nevis Labs, Columbia Univ | mailto://seligman@nevis.columbia.edu
>> PO Box 137 | http://www.nevis.columbia.edu/~seligman/
>> Irvington NY 10533 USA | XDI: http://public.xdi.org/=william.seligman
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Sun Feb 12 2006 - 00:01:01 CST